Thromb Haemost 1991; 65(02): 122-125
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1647468
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

The Effect of Different Anaesthetic Techniques on the Incidence of Thrombosis following Total Hip Replacement

Jaap A Hoek
1   The Center for Haemostasis, Thrombosis, and Atherosclerosis Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Ch Pieter Henny
2   The Department of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Haye C Knipscheer
1   The Center for Haemostasis, Thrombosis, and Atherosclerosis Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Hugo ten Cate
1   The Center for Haemostasis, Thrombosis, and Atherosclerosis Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Michael T Nurmohamed
1   The Center for Haemostasis, Thrombosis, and Atherosclerosis Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Jan W ten Cate
1   The Center for Haemostasis, Thrombosis, and Atherosclerosis Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 06 June 1990

Accepted after revision 04 September 1990

Publication Date:
02 July 2018 (online)

Preview

Summary

We performed a retrospective analysis on the influence of three types of anaesthesia on the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) following total hip replacement (THR) in consecutive patients randomized to either the low molecular weight heparinoid Otg 10172 (97 patients), of placebo (99 patients). Ninety patients were operated under epidural anaesthesia, 77 patients under psoas compartment block with additional inhalation anaesthesia, and 29 patients under general anaesthesia. DVT assessment was performed by bilateral venography between days 8 and 12 postoperatively. The overall incidence of DVT in the 196 patients was 37% in the epidural anaesthasia group, 35% in the psoas compartment block group, and 36% in the general anaesthesia group. Although the incidence of DVT in patients randomuedto placebo was similar in the two anaesthesia groups (53%), there was an important reduction of the occurrence of proximal DVT by the heparinoid in the psoas compartment block group (from 20 to 0%), compared to the epidural anaesthesia group (from 27 to l8%) (p <0.0061). Significant y more minor wound hematomas occurred in the psoas compartment block group as compared to the epidural anaesthesia group (p <0.05). Synergrsm of thrombin generation inhibition by the heparinoid and inhibition of plateletlggregation at the damaged vessel wall, by high local concentrations of bupivacaine in the psoas compartment block technique, is proposed as a possible mechanism behind this observation.